While studying spontaneous mutations at the maize
Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
bronze (bz ) locus, we made the unexpected discovery that specific low-copy number retrotransposons are mobile in the pollen of some maize lines, but not of others. We conducted large-scale genetic experiments to isolate newbz mutations from severalBz stocks and recovered spontaneous stable mutations only in the pollen parent in reciprocal crosses. Most of the new stablebz mutations resulted from either insertions of low-copy number long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons or deletions, the same two classes of mutations that predominated in a collection of spontaneouswx mutations [Wessler S (1997)The Mutants of Maize , pp 385–386]. Similar mutations were recovered at the closely linkedsh locus. These events occurred with a frequency of 2–4 × 10−5in two lines derived from W22 and in 4Co63, but not at all in B73 or Mo17, two inbreds widely represented in Corn Belt hybrids. Surprisingly, the mutagenic LTR retrotransposons differed in the active lines, suggesting differences in the autonomous element make-up of the lines studied. Some active retrotransposons, likeHopscotch ,Magellan , andBs2 , aBs1 variant, were described previously; others, likeFoto andFocou in 4Co63, were not. By high-throughput sequencing of retrotransposon junctions, we established that retrotranposition ofHopscotch ,Magellan , andBs2 occurs genome-wide in the pollen of active lines, but not in the female germline or in somatic tissues. We discuss here the implications of these results, which shed light on the source, frequency, and nature of spontaneous mutations in maize. -
Summary The unusual eukaryotic
Helitron transposons can readily capture host sequences and are, thus, evolutionarily important. They are presumed to amplify by rolling‐circle replication (RCR ) because some elements encode predicted proteins homologous toRCR prokaryotic transposases. In support of this replication mechanism, it was recently shown that transposition of a batHelitron generates covalently closed circular intermediates. Another strong prediction is thatRCR should generate tandemHelitron concatemers, yet almost allHelitrons identified to date occur as solo elements in the genome. To investigate alternative modes ofHelitron organization in present‐day genomes, we have applied the novel computational tool HelitronScanner to 27 plant genomes and have uncovered numerous tandem arrays of partially decayed, truncatedHelitrons in all of them. Strikingly, most of theseHelitron tandem arrays are interspersed with other repeats in centromeres. Many of these arrays have multipleHelitron 5′ ends, but a single 3′ end. The number of repeats in any one array can range from a handful to several hundreds. We propose here anRCR model that conforms to the presentHelitron landscape of plant genomes. Our study provides strong evidence that plantHelitrons amplify byRCR and that the tandemly arrayed replication products accumulate mostly in centromeres.